Showing posts with label point. Show all posts
Showing posts with label point. Show all posts

Monday, July 9, 2012

War of the Roses Preview




Paradox Interactive gets straight to the point when War of the Roses is introduced. Senior producer Gordon Van Dyke describes it as their “flagship game of the year,” the standout title amongst the publisher's busy roster. Whether gamers agree, or perhaps instead find it more of an acquired taste, there's never been anything quite like it before and its shaping up to be a very, very brutal experience.







War of the Roses is best described as Battlefield set in the late middle ages. Up to 64 players will slash and stab their way through pitched battles or sieges, their carbines replaced by crossbows and their sniper rifles swapped for swords, all of which naturally makes combat a much more intimate affair. More often than not, you'll be staring your opponent in the face as you strike them down or suffer their anger, and even archers and crossbowmen will find they frequently have to get up close and personal to finish the job they started.








It's all very nuanced. You'll also be able to pick what kind of steel your weapon is made of, even your edge grind.





In fact, just about everyone has to get their hands dirty. One of the most distinctive and even disturbing features of the game is the finishing moves. No, you didn't read that wrong, there's almost a Mortal Kombat element of execution on show here, because warriors who fall in battle are left immobile on the ground, halfway between life and death. With luck, a friend can revive them and return them to the fight, but otherwise it's the duty of an opponent to walk over to body, straddle it and ram their weapon into the eyes, neck or temple of the helpless victim, often several times. A quick glance across any battlefield in War of the Roses inevitably identifies at least one or two combatants leaning down to slaughter their foes. It's the kind of naked violence that would make a tabloid editor perk up like a meerkat and if you're the victim of it, you have to suffer it all from your first-person perspective.


Should that not quench your thirst for blood, there are plenty of other ways to harm people as you fight your way through one of England's most brutal wars. Developer Fatshark are promising a veritable armoury of weapons, all of which have their own distinctive characteristics and physics. Daggers are fast but weak, while polearms have a long reach but swing poorly in a confined space, glancing off walls and obstacles.







All your slashing, stabbing and parrying is controlled through small movements of the mouse, making combat as much about timing and precision as it is the size and type of the sword you choose. “It's all very nuanced,” Gordon explains. “You'll also be able to pick what kind of steel your weapon is made of, even your edge grind.” Your edge grind, by the way, is the cross-section of your blade, and even that can make a difference.








At its very best, the merciless melees of War of the Roses could almost resemble a 64-player equivalent of the expertly-modelled combat in something like Demon's Souls.





If customising your weapons still isn't enough for you, the armour is similarly detailed, and players will be able to carefully design their own crests and coats of arms (“You will look much cooler!”), making every warrior on a battlefield a distinct individual that you can bear a grudge against. While the colour of your plume may be cosmetic, the idea is that all your other equipment will have an important bearing on how you fight, with archers aiming for chinks in your defences and particular weapons working better against certain armour. Feel free to don a heavy helmet for protection, but your field of vision will suffer.


At its very best, the merciless melees of War of the Roses could almost resemble a 64-player equivalent of the expertly-modelled combat in something like Demon's Souls. Imagine skirmishes where every participant sports the combination of the weapons and armour they personally prefer, knights cautiously skirting their opponents as they try to time their killing blows, groups of soldiers trying to outflank one another, archers scattering suddenly in the face of a cavalry charge.







Though there's still much tweaking and balancing to be done, the current alpha build of the game shows just how exciting, challenging and cruel it can be. This doesn't look like something that new players can immediately leap into, but there's a lot of satisfaction to be had from mastering its combat mechanics. Fatshark are also promising a comprehensive single-player campaign, something that will no doubt help introduce the subtleties of 15th Century warfare, but let's not kid ourselves here. This is a game that's all about challenging real people to a duel to the death.



Source : ign[dot]com

Friday, June 22, 2012

Blizzard Explains Diablo III's Restricted Access




Update: Blizzard has issued a statement explaining why players who purchase Diablo III digitally from this point forward will need to wait up to 72 hours for full game access.


"For security reasons and to help ensure the integrity of the game and auction house service, players who purchase the digital version of Diablo III may have to wait until payment verification is complete before they can access certain game features."


"Similar to World of Warcraft, these restrictions were put in place to deter credit card fraud, which in turn helps reduce gold spam and other harmful activities that can have a negative impact on the game experience for everyone."


The level 13 cap and progress limit at the Skeleton King boss fight in Act I, as reported below, were not actually intentionally implemented, according to Blizzard. "An unintended consequence of these security measures, players who purchase the game digitally after patch 1.0.3 are temporarily being capped at level 13 and not able to proceed beyond Act I. We are working to correct this as soon as possible and will provide another update when we have more details to share."


Here's the full list of restrictions, aside from the mistake with the level and progress cap.



  • No public game access for unverified digital purchasers

  • No auction house access (real-money or gold) for unverified digital purchasers

  • Unverified digital purchasers cannot trade items or drop items for other players to receive

  • Unverified digital purchasers are not able to chat in any public or game channels

  • Unverified digital purchasers cannot attach a custom message to friend requests, but they can send/accept friend requests, and play with their friends



  • Global Play is not available for unverified digital purchasers


Blizzard claims that in most cases restrictions are lifted within 24 hours. Have you purchased Diablo III digitally within the last few days? What has your experience been like?







Original Story: Most of the staff at IGN has been enjoying Diablo III. In fact, many of us talk about it so much that we've convinced friends and other co-workers to buy it. While plenty of people are willing to go out to a store or purchase a boxed copy online, many more turn to Battle.net and quickly pick up a digital copy. As of the new 1.0.3, though, new customers can apparently only unlock the full game three days after purchase.


In a post on Blizzard's support forums, the details are made clear (though not explained at all):


As of patch 1.0.3, when purchasing a digital version of Diablo III through the online store or your Battle.net Account, players are restricted to the Starter Edition for the first 72 hours (sometimes less). Players on Starter Editions have the following restrictions:



  • Act I up to the Skeleton King is available

  • Level 13 cap

  • Matchmaking available only with other Starter Edition players

  • No Auction House access (Real Money or Gold)

  • Global Play is not available. Players attempting to connect to Diablo III Starter Edition in a region other than their Battle.net Account's home region will receive Error 12. See the Global Play support article for more information.


Basically, people who go out and purchase the game in-full are restricted to the content from the Beta. We've reached out to Blizzard for clarification, since at the moment we're just left wondering why this step would be taken. Perhaps it has something to do with restricting access in order to help server loads? Or maybe keep would-be farmers from buying a bunch of copies to put a ton of auctions up and get around the 10-item per account limit? Let's all speculate together.



Source : ign[dot]com

Monday, May 7, 2012

Rumor: Sony Crafting New Killzone Teaser



There's little doubt at this point that Sony intends on continuing the Killzone franchise in a major way. Here's what we already know: Sony-owned developer Guerilla Games, the studio that created the Killzone franchise, is spearheading three Killzone titles with the help of fellow first-party studio Sony Cambridge.

Guerilla confirmed at GDC that Killzone titles are in the works for PlayStation 3 and PlayStation Vita. Perhaps the third game is for the yet-unannounced PlayStation 4? It's all conjecture at this point.

But according to Siliconera, Sony may be ready to show the next Killzone game very soon. "Sony Computer Entertainment is recording a teaser for a future Killzone game," Siliconera reports with information from an unnamed source. "The upcoming title takes place after the events of Killzone 3."


Siliconera has text purportedly from the voiceover from the trailer. The voiceover, according to Siliconera's source, was written for a female "who has ties to the Helghan Autarch."

The site notes their source can't (or won't) pinpoint whether the trailer is specifically for the PS Vita iteration of Killzone. However, specifically referring to the game as taking place after the events of Killzone 3 points us in the direction of a possible Killzone 4 for PS3, per Guerilla Games admitting that it's working on an unannounced Killzone title on PlayStation 3.



Source : http://ps3.ign.com/articles/122/1224480p1.html

Blockbuster UK Lists Possible Wii U Launch Titles



A list of possible upcoming Wii U titles has been leaked via alleged photos from Blockbuster UK's internal point of sale system.

The list, which first appeared on GoNintendo, is composed of 25 already known and unannounced titles, including Splinter Cell 6 and Formula 1 All Stars in the latter group.

First party titles included are Pikmin, Shield Pose and New Super Mario Brothers Mii.

The entire list, which remains unconfirmed, is as below.

• Just Dance 4
• Killer Freaks From Outer Space
• Marvel Super Heroes
• Metro Last Light
• Monsters Party
• New Super Mario Brothers Mii
• Ninja Gaiden 3
• Pikmin
• Rabbids Party Land
• Raving Rabbids
• Rayman Legends
• Shield Pose
• Splinter Cell 6
• Sports Connection
• Tekken
• Your Shape 2013
• Zombie
• Aliens: Colonial Marines
• Assassin's Creed
• Batman Arkham City
• Darksiders II
• Dirt 3
• Formula 1 All Stars
• Game Party
• Ghost Recon Online


Source : http://wii.ign.com/articles/122/1224426p1.html