Galaxy Tab Not as Cool as iPad, Says Court

In a UK court ruling regarding a patent dispute between the Apple and Samsung, a judge ruled in favor of Samsung, but not before massively insulting them them. Judge Birss claimed that the two tablets in question (The Galaxy Tab and iPad) are not similar enough to side with Apple, because the Galaxy Tab isn’t as “cool” as the iPad. “They [the Galaxy Tabs] are not as cool,” Birss said in his ruling. “The overall impression produced is different.”

This lawsuit specifically targeted the design of three Samsung tablets. Apple claims that those tablets copy the iPad, and is currently suing Samsung in numerous countries, including the US. Last week Apple won an injunction to bar the Galaxy Nexus from being sold in the US, though Google has already changed the patent infringement on the smartphone.

“They do not have the same understated and extreme simplicity which is possessed by the Apple design,” Birss said. Samsung rebutted the ruling by stating, “Should Apple continue to make excessive legal claims in other countries based on such generic designs, innovation in the industry could be harmed and consumer choice unduly limited.” Apple released a statement saying, “This kind of blatant copying is wrong and, as we’ve said many times before, we need to protect Apple’s intellectual properties when companies steal our ideas.”

The ruling will remain in effect until Apple appeals the judgment, which they can do so within 21 days.

Source : ign[dot]com

Epic Wins Silicon Knights Court Case

Epic has emerged victorious from its long-running court case with Silicon Knights. According to a tweet from Epic’s Mark Rein, the jury found for Epic on all counts.

The trial first began in 2007 when Silicon Knights served Epic with a lawsuit alleging that Unreal Engine 3 did not work as promised. At the time, Silicon Knights president Denis Dyack wrote that Epic was “unable or unwilling” to fix the engine’s problems and accused Epic of using licensing fees to develop Gears of War rather than working on Unreal, and said that the technical problems forced them to develop a separate engine, making Too Human significantly more expensive to produce.

The lawsuit began during the development of Too Human

Today, Epic said the following in a statement: “The jury rejected Silicon Knights' claim that Epic breached its Unreal Engine 3 license agreement with Silicon Knights. The jury also found in Epic's favor on all of its counterclaims, namely that Silicon Knights breached the license agreement, misappropriated Epic's trade secrets, and infringed Epic's copyrights in the Unreal Engine 3 code. The jury awarded Epic damages totaling $4.45 million. Epic has 30 days in which to file a request to the court for reimbursement of attorneys' fees and costs. The court previously had thrown out Silicon Knights' fraud claims after nine days of testimony.”

"We are delighted with the jury's verdict and all of the hard work done by the Hunton & Williams legal team,” Epic general counsel Jay Andrews added.

In the five years since the trial began, additional information has slowly emerged. As the release of Too Human approached in 2008, Silicon Knights sought a court order to block Epic from viewing code for the game, as the company had developed a proprietary 3D camera system and was seeking a patent. Epic eventually counter-sued and the case went to trial earlier this year. Earlier this month, a judge ruled that Silicon Knights could earn only one dollar if the case had fallen in their favor.

In the wake of today's verdict, the future of Silicon Knights remains uncertain. The developer last released X-Men: Destiny, which received a 5.5 from IGN last year. We've reached out to the studio for its response to the verdict and will update with any comment we receive.



Source : http://www.ign.com